Evidence Hub

Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: current evidence and interpretations from monitoring studies

Müller T, Denzin N, Freuling CM

BMC veterinary research, 2026

Abstract

To synthesize current knowledge on pseudorabies virus (PRV; also known as Aujeszky's disease virus or Suid alphaherpesvirus 1) infections in wild swine, a combined review and meta-analysis was conducted. The study aimed to critically interpret reported PRV seroprevalence data, assess risks for animal health and disease control programs, and inform future monitoring and management strategies. An extensive literature search covering the period from 1970 to 2025 identified 160 serosurveys published between 1979 and 2024, yielding 516 datasets for analysis. Binomial logistic and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to assess spatio-temporal patterns. The results indicate that PRV is widely established in wild swine populations, particularly in Europe and North America, forming stable endemic cycles largely independent of host density. Persistent spatial heterogeneity and region-specific temporal trends were observed, and once introduced into naïve populations, PRV appears to persist long term, limiting the added value of continued monitoring in long-established endemic areas.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free