Evidence Hub

Knowledge and perception of dementia risk and protective factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sambou ML, Dobbe JHM, Albers EAC, Deckers K, Arends LR, Ikram MA, Smets EMA, Bramer WM et al.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026

164,644 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Optimal dementia risk reduction strategies benefit from sufficient public knowledge of risk factors and risk perception, but current public awareness is uncertain.

Methods: In a systematic literature review on public knowledge and perception of dementia risk factors, we searched relevant databases for original research articles until 2024. When possible, we pooled study results using random effects meta-analysis, and explored sources of heterogeneity through meta-regression. Qualitative studies and studies about risk perception were analysed using narrative synthesis.

Findings: Of 4996 articles screened, 155 were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 125 reported on knowledge of risk factors and 50 on risk perception, jointly providing data from 164,644 participants in 41 countries across 6 continents. Recognition of the 28 queried risk and protective factors was moderate, somewhat higher for lifestyle factors (medians: 38.5-71.5%) than for cardiovascular (9.9-66.9%) and environmental (25.4-44.4%) factors, but with large heterogeneity across queried factors. With the exception of physical activity (71.5%, IQR:46.9-88.3%), social isolation (66.6% [23.7-84.0%]) and traumatic brain injury (65.0% [18.0-76.7%]), recognition of all established modifiable risk factors for dementia from prespecified lists was below 50%, lowest for education (19.5% [7.8-54.9%]), air pollution (25.4% [16.3-41.0%]), and obesity (30.4% [27.0-43.0%]). Recall of risk factors (7 studies) was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 164,644 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free