Evidence Hub

Anatomical Variations of the Brachial Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abdu SM, Muhaba ES, Assefa EM

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

The brachial artery (BA) variations are important anatomical variants with significant implications for anatomists, radiologists, and surgeons. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of BA variations, including their types, sex distribution, laterality, side predominance, and global patterns. A systematic search was conducted across three online databases (PubMed, Hinari, and Google Scholar) as well as key anatomical journals, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the Evidence-Based Anatomy Workgroup recommendations. Meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL software to calculate pooled prevalence rates and distribution characteristics of BA variations by employing a random-effects model. A total of 57 study reports met the inclusion criteria. Typical BA anatomy was observed in approximately 90% of individuals, while BA variations were present in about 10%. Variations showed significant right-side (65%) and unilateral (71%) dominance, with males accounting for 58%. The most common variant was the brachioradial artery, present in 6% of limbs and comprising 66% of all BA variations, followed by the superficial brachial artery (6% of limbs, 29% of variations) and the accessory brachial artery, seen in 4% of limbs and accounting for 32% of variations. The brachioulnar artery, a high-origin ulnar artery, was less common (2% of limbs, 12% of variations). BA variations were evenly distributed across all continents. The meta-analysis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free