Evidence Hub

Association Between Frailty and Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bui HT, Apriliyasari RW, Bui QHQ, Tsai PS

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2026

129,868 participants

Abstract

Background: The literature has reported conflicting findings regarding the association between frailty and cognitive impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between frailty and cognitive impairment in patients with CKD.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from database inception to February 2026. Eligible studies comprised cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies that reported associations between frailty and cognitive impairment in patients with CKD, with no time or language restrictions.

Results: A total of 17 studies (9 cross-sectional and 8 cohort) involving 129,868 patients with CKD (mean age 60.88 years) were included in the meta-analysis. The findings indicated that patients with frailty with CKD had significantly higher odds of cognitive impairment than robust patients (odds ratio = 3.13, 95% CI 1.92-5.12). Heterogeneity in association size was influenced by study region, frailty measurement methods, and whether covariate adjustments were made during data analysis (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a significant association between frailty and cognitive impairment in patients with CKD. Future prospective cohort studies should assess the causal relationships between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 129,868 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free