Evidence Hub

The global detection rate of human papillomavirus DNA in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sameni F, Safavi M, Elkhichi PA, Vaezjalali M, Navidinia M, Bairami A, Dadashi M

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with high mortality rates despite advancements in treatment. Microbial infections play a significant role in inducing carcinogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in ovarian cancer cases worldwide. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from 2000 to 2024 using relevant keywords. Data were statistically analyzed using Stata software. RESULTS: After screening and data extraction, 25 original articles were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimate of HPV infection among ovarian cancer patients was 22.9% (95% CI, 15.8–32.1). Subgroup analyses showed the highest prevalence in studies from Asia (26.6%; 95% CI, 18.8–36.4) and Europe (20.9%; 95% CI, 7.2–47.3). HPV types 16 and 18 were the most frequent genotypes detected worldwide (40.2% and 25.9%, respectively). When stratified by diagnostic methods, PCR-based methods (including conventional, real-time, and nested PCR) showed a pooled HPV estimate of 18.9% (95% CI, 12.6–27.3), whereas in situ hybridization (ISH)-based studies reported a substantially higher estimate of 48.9% (95% CI, 34.9–63.1). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that HPV DNA may be detected in a proportion of ovarian cancer cases, with higher prevalence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free