Evidence Hub

Global prevalence and trends of fluconazole resistance in non-albicans Candida species: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li X, Sholeh M, Moghadam MA, Ostadrahimi M, Hosseini SS

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The emergence of fluconazole-resistant non-albicans Candida (NAC) species poses a major challenge for the long-term management of candidiasis, particularly in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: A systematic search of four major databases was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify studies reporting fluconazole resistance among NAC species. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to estimate resistance prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and the I² statistic. RESULTS: This global meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of fluconazole resistance among NAC species. Resistance rates varied substantially across species, with C. krusei showing the highest pooled resistance (78.3%), followed by C. glabrata (15.9%), C. tropicalis (13.0%), and C. dubliniensis (11.1%). Subgroup analyses revealed increasing temporal trends in resistance, particularly for C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis, with statistically significant increases confirmed by meta-regression (p < 0.05). Geographic disparities were evident: C. glabrata resistance was highest in South Korea (80.5%) and lowest in Peru (1.3%), while C. krusei resistance peaked in the Americas (96.7%) and was lowest in Africa (34.1%). Resistance estimates also differed by antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) method, particularly for C. krusei, where MIC-based methods identified substantially higher resistance than other…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free