Evidence Hub

Global Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Individuals With Atopic Dermatitis and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kim SH, Kim S, Yeo D, Hong S, Lee Y, Jo Y, Cho SH, Yon DK et al.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2026

10,851 participants

Abstract

Objective: Asthma and atopic dermatitis are associated with various physical and psychosocial outcomes, however, the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in these populations remains underexplored. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of sexual dysfunction among individuals with asthma and atopic dermatitis.

Design: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted stratifying by sex, geographic regions and diagnostic tools.

Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 1 July 2025.

Eligibility criteria: Studies including adults with asthma or atopic dermatitis were eligible. Sexual dysfunction was defined as impairments in sexual desire or sexual response, identified via clinical diagnosis or validated questionnaires, including the Female Sexual Function Index and International Index of Erectile Function.

Results: A total of 19 studies comprising 10,851 participants, including 1577 patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis from 18 countries across five continents, were included. The pooled prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 54.3% (95% CI 45.9-64.3) in asthma and 19.1% (13.4-27.3) in atopic dermatitis. In both conditions, prevalence was substantially higher in females than males: 71.5% (95% CI 63.3-80.7) versus 29.6% (17.1-51.2) in asthma and 53.0% (36.4-77.1) versus 16.7% (7.3-38.2) in atopic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10,851 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free