Evidence Hub

Moderate to high prevalence of spin revealed in abstracts and main texts of medical publications: a systematic review of research-on-research studies

Su N, van der Linden M, van der Heijden G, Listl S, Faggion CM

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2026

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of spin in medical publications across different study designs and disciplines and to identify related factors for spin, through a systematic review of research-on-research studies (RoRSs).

Study design and setting: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS on May 10, 2021 and updated the searching on March 19, 2025 for RoRSs examining spin in any types of primary studies (eg, randomized controlled trials [RCTs], non-RCTs, systematic reviews [SRs], and observational studies) in any field of medicine. Meta-analyses were used to evaluate the prevalence of spin in titles, abstracts, and main texts and to analyze related factors for spin.

Results: A total of 133 RoRSs were included. For RCTs, the prevalence of spin was 3.2% (96/2250; 95% CI: 1.7% 5.0%) in titles, 59.0% (2206/3762; 95% CI: 51.8% 66.0%) in abstracts, and 64.8% (769/1303; 95% CI: 54.4% 74.7%) in main texts. For SRs, the prevalence was 0.1% (39/4168; 95% CI: 0.0% 0.5%), 49.3% (1582/4431; 95% CI: 41.5% 57.1%), and 54.5% (101/225; 95% CI: 36.4% 72.0%) in titles, abstracts, and main texts, respectively. Presence of spin in RCT abstracts was significantly associated with H-index of first authors (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, P = .01, I2 = 0%), exact P value reported (yes versus no: OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.50, P = .0003, I2 = 0%), number of centers (multicenter vs single-center: OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27-0.59, P = .000005, I2 = 12%), publication year (OR: 1.09, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free