Evidence Hub

Prevalence of c-shaped canal morphology in premolar and molar teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis

Yousefi F, Mohammadi Y, Shokri E

BMC oral health, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of c-shaped canal in mandibular and maxillary premolars and molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the effect of factors (e.g., gender, geographic region and position in the jaw) on the prevalence of this anomaly.

Materials and methods: A search was conducted in 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus and web of science) and studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were studies that investigated the prevalence of C-shaped canal using CBCT images until 2024. The I2 statistic was performed to determine heterogeneity and meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: Of 5548 studies, 101 studies were selected for meta-analysis based on inclusion criteria. The highest prevalence of c-shaped canal was in the mandibular second molar (17.3%) and the lowest prevalence was in the maxillary first molar (0.8%). The prevalence of c-shaped canal in the mandibular second molar was higher in women (Female: 23.6%, Male: 16.7%). C-shaped canal in the mandibular second molar was more common in Asian continent compared to other continents. The prevalence of C-shaped canals did not differ significantly in the mandibular second molar on the right and left sides (Right: 21.2%, Left: 23.1%).

Conclusion: Based on the results of this systematic review, the highest prevalence of c-shaped canal was in the mandibular second molar and it was more in Asian continent. Clinicians can consider the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free