Evidence Hub

Aetiology of fever of unknown origin in people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Copaja-Corzo C, Ticona-Tiña D, Caira-Chuquineyra B, Fernandez-Guzman D

HIV medicine, 2025

1,592 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) in people living with HIV presents a significant diagnostic challenge due to its broad range of potential aetiologies.

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of different aetiologies causing FUO in people living with HIV through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Additionally, we assessed the prevalence of FUO and its associated mortality.

Methods: We searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and the Virtual Health Library, up to September 2024. We included observational studies that evaluated the aetiology, prevalence and mortality of FUO in people living with HIV. We performed meta-analyses using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled effects for each outcome. Risk of bias was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data.

Results: A total of 1678 studies were screened, of which 23 studies comprising 1592 people living with HIV were included. The pooled prevalence of FUO was 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7%-16.3%; I2 = 99%). FUO prevalence varied across continents, with higher rates in Asia (21.8%) and South America (17.1%) than in Europe (8.9%) and North America (8.5%). The pooled mortality rate was 15.2% (95% CI: 5.6%-28.2%; I2 = 92%), with long-term follow-up studies reporting higher mortality (≥24 months: 63.0%). Bacterial infections were the leading cause of FUO (49.2% [95% CI: 40.8%-57.6%]; I2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,592 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free