Evidence Hub

Exploring global trends in human toxoplasmosis seroprevalence by meta-analysis

Sengupta PP, Jacob SS, Suresh KP, Rajamani S, Maharana SM

Experimental parasitology, 2025

658,172 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Understanding the global prevalence of infectious diseases is essential for effective public health strategies and resource allocation. Among foodborne diseases, toxoplasmosis-caused by Toxoplasma gondii-poses significant health risks, particularly for pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals. This study presents one of the most comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to date, synthesizing global seroprevalence estimates of human toxoplasmosis from 320 studies, covering 658,172 individuals across 113 countries and six continents, spanning the period from 1959 to 2020. A thorough literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, applying rigorous inclusion criteria to ensure methodological consistency. The pooled global seroprevalence was estimated at 31 % (95 % CI: 28-34 %), with marked heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 99.6 %). The highest prevalence was observed in Australia (54 %), South America (45 %), and Africa (42 %), while Asia reported the lowest (25 %). Country-wise, Brazil and Ghana had the highest prevalence (68 %), whereas Vietnam had the lowest (5 %). Temporal analysis revealed an upward trend, reaching 34 % during 2011-2020. Diagnostic methods significantly influenced prevalence estimates, with IFAT yielding the highest rate (41 %). Extensive subgroup analyses by region, time period, country, and diagnostic technique provided granular insights into seroprevalence patterns. While…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 658,172 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free