Evidence Hub

Does Epstein-Barr Virus Contribute to Breast Cancer Risk Worldwide? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

de Moraes FCA, Wagner PHS, da Silva ABN, Magalhães MCF, Burbano RMR

Clinical breast cancer, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide, accounting for over 2.3 million new cases annually. Recent evidence suggests Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may play a role in its pathogenesis. Given EBV's known oncogenic potential, this study investigates the prevalence and possible role of EBV in BC pathogenesis.

Methods: Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate raw proportions and risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I². Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Analyses were performed in R 4.2.3 RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 57 studies, comprising a total of 5,133 BC tissues to analyze the presence of EBV. Our analysis revealed a prevalence of 25% (95% CI: 21%-30%) of EBV in BC tissues. In the analysis by continent, Europe, Africa, and Oceania showed a similar proportion of 33%. Regarding the risk of EBV in BC tissues compared to healthy controls, the analysis identified a statistically significant difference, presenting higher risk of EBV in the BC group (RR: 3.35; P < .001). South America showed the highest and significant RR of 12.34 (P = .007) among the continents. Subgroup analysis by income revealed that the low-income-group exhibited the highest EBV prevalence (44%; 95% CI: 28%-61%). According to the subtype BC analysis, triple-negative BC exhibited the highest EBV prevalence (30%; 95% CI: 19%-44%).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis underscores the global prevalence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free