Evidence Hub

Overview of the prevalence of loneliness and associated risk factors among older adults across six continents: A meta-analysis

Susanty S, Nadirawati N, Setiawan A, Haroen H, Pebrianti S, Harun H, Azissah D, Suyanto J et al.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 2025

462,083 participants · 58 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, loneliness is a growing public health concern associated with poor mental and physical health among older adults. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the prevalence of loneliness and associated risk factors among older adults across six continents.

METHODS

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and references lists were comprehensively searched until April 2024. Data analysis was performed using Logit Transformation model in R-Software for pooled prevalence and DerSimonian-Lard random-effects model in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis for associated factors of loneliness. Heterogeneity was quantified by I2 and τ2 statistics. The funnel plot and Egger's regression test assessed publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies with 462,083 older adults were included. The pooled prevalence of loneliness was 26 % (95 %CI, 23 %-30 %) with 38 % for North America, 34 % for Africa, 32 % for Asia and South America, 23 % for Europe, and 13 % for Oceania. Cognitive impairment (2.98; 95 %CI, 1.30-6.81), poor health (2.35; 95 %CI, 1.59-3.45), female (1.92; 95 %CI, 1.53-2.41), depression (1.74; 95 %CI, 1.40-2.16), widowed (1.67; 95 %CI, 1.13-2.48), single (1.51; 95 %CI, 1.06-2.17), institutionalization (2.95; 95 %CI, 1.48-5.88), rural residency (1.18; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.34) were associated with increased risk of loneliness. Being married (0.51; 95 %CI, 0.31-0.82), male (0.55; 95 %CI, 0.43-0.70), and non-institutionalization (0.34; 95 %CI,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 462,083 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free