Evidence Hub

Global prevalence of myopic macular degeneration in general population and patients with high myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hekai Shi, Nuojin Guo, Zeming Zhao, Xiaoyu He, Jia-Hang Li, Jia-Liang Duan

European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023

71,052 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

The prevalence of myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in the general population and patients with high myopia worldwide has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we screened all population-based studies that reported the prevalence of MMD, and pooled prevalence of MMD using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the differences in MMD prevalence in the general population and patients with high myopia according to ethnicity, region of residence (urban/rural), and grading system. Finally, 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results obtained from 2,963 patients from seven countries on four continents indicated that the pooled prevalence of MMD in patients with high myopia was 49.0% (95% CI: 31.5%–66.7%). Results obtained from 71,052 participants from 10 countries on four continents suggested that the pooled prevalence of MMD in the general population was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.6%). In the general population, living in urban areas and East Asians were associated with a high prevalence of MMD. Among patients with high myopia, only East Asians were at a higher risk of developing MMD. In conclusion, MMD was particularly prevalent in patients with high myopia. Compared with Europeans, East Asians (Chinese and Japanese) have a higher propensity of developing MMD, both in the general population and in patients with high myopia. It remains unclear whether the higher prevalence of MMD in patients with high myopia in East Asia is caused by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 71,052 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free