Evidence Hub

Global, regional, and national prevalence of depression among cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zahra Noorani Mejareh, B. Abdollahi, Zahra Hoseinipalangi, Melika Jeze, H. Hosseinifard, S. Rafiei, F. Aghajani, A. Dehnad et al.

Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2021

182,521 participants · 66 citations

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a summary of the existing evidence on the prevalence of depression among cancer patients worldwide to assist health policymakers in adopting appropriate measures to prevent and control depression in these patients. EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for original studies published in English from January 2000 to July 2019. The studies were screened on the basis of quality and relevance criteria. The statistical analyses were conducted in the R software. Out of 182,521 cancer patients examined in 183 studies, 49,280 (~27%) had depression (95% confidence interval [CI] = 24%–30%). The highest prevalence of depression was among patients with colorectal cancer with 32% (95% CI = 20%–47%). Among countries, Pakistan with 43% (95% CI = 26%–64%), and among continents, Africa with 36% (95% CI = 29%–43%) had the highest prevalence of reported depression in cancer patients. Adjusting for sample size, the prevalence of depression among female cancer patients, 31% (95% CI = 26%–36%), was higher than men, 26% (95% CI = 21%–31%). The prevalence of depression among cancer patients is increasing by an average of 0.6% per year. The findings show higher prevalence of depression among cancer patients in underdeveloped and developing countries compared to the developed nations and the global average.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 182,521 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free