Evidence Hub

The experience of financial burden for people with multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative research

Larkin J, Foley L, Smith SM, Harrington P, Clyne B

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity prevalence is increasing globally. People with multimorbidity have higher health care costs, which can create a financial burden.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize qualitative research exploring experience of financial burden for people with multimorbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY: Six databases were searched in May 2019. A grey literature search and backward and forward citation checking were also conducted.

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they used a qualitative design, conducted primary data collection, included references to financial burden and had at least one community-dwelling adult participant with two or more chronic conditions.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening and critical appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently. One reviewer extracted data from the results section; this was checked by a second reviewer. GRADE-CERQual was used to summarize the certainty of the evidence. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS: Forty-six studies from six continents were included. Four themes were generated: the high costs people with multimorbidity experience, the coping strategies they use to manage these costs, and the negative effect of both these on their well-being. Health insurance and government supports determine the manageability and level of costs experienced.

DISCUSSION: Financial burden has a negative effect on people with multimorbidity. Continuity of care and an awareness of the impact of financial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free