Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the interaction between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in humans

Haghdoost AA, Alexander N

Journal of vector borne diseases, 2007

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the interaction between Plasmodium falciparum and R vivax and the sources of heterogeneity between studies.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed three databases: Medline (1966-2001), Embase (1980-2001) and CAB-health (1976-2001). Random effects meta-analysis was applied to the data of 62 selected populations. Meta-regression was used to assess the following potential sources of heterogeneity: age-group, presence of fever, continent, temporal and spatial span of studies, and endemicity level.

RESULTS: The summary odds ratio (OR) between P. falciparum and P. vivax was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.49-0.79). The minimum and maximum observed ORs were 0.01 and 10.9, respectively, and the heterogeneity test was highly significant (tau2 = 0.92, p < 0.0001)--the ORs varied over a very wide range. The ORs in longer studies and in those from areas with higher prevalence yielded smaller, more strongly negative association. This is consistent with the idea that any difference in the species' temporal patterns should decrease the OR, and more so over longer periods of time.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Although such odds ratios between Plasmodium species may be partly due to missed mixed infections when reading blood slides, the negative association between the OR and prevalence supports the existence of biological interactions such as suppression or cross-immunity between species.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free