Evidence Hub

Global prevalence and risk factors of bovine tuberculosis in cattle: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kifouly AH, Kouin O, Alowanou G, Bekindaka ON, Challaton P, Akadiri AS, Samba AF, Dossou J et al.

Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, is a chronic zoonotic disease of major global importance, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where surveillance and control remain inadequate.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of bTB, identify key risk factors, and evaluate diagnostic approaches to support evidence-based control strategies within a One Health framework.

Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, CAB Abstracts, SpringerLink, and AJOL) for studies published between 1990 and October 2025. A total of 7,775 records were identified, of which 98 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis.

Results: The pooled global prevalence of bTB was estimated at 3.98% (95% CI, 3.94-4.03) and an overall herd's estimate was 18.48% (95% CI, 17.47-19.49). Meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower odds of infection at the animal level compared to herd level (OR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.15-0.37; p 2 = 94%), indicating higher cumulative detection in herds. Subgroup analysis showed that Africa contributed the largest proportion of reported cases (61.22%), followed by Asia (30.61%), while other continents had marginal contributions. At regional level, Eastern Africa accounted for 41.84% of included studies, with Ethiopia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free