Evidence Hub

The oncogenic role of human papillomavirus in breast cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Koishybayeva D, Balmagambetova S, Zhakiev B, Koishybayev A, Mussin NM, Sakhanova S, Aitmagambetova M, Tulyayeva A et al.

Frontiers in microbiology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer (BC), though its role remains controversial. Understanding HPV prevalence and genotype distribution across histological types and regions may clarify this potential association.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published between January 1990 and April 2025. Eligible studies reported HPV prevalence in BC tissues stratified by histological classification. Non-English studies, reviews, and those lacking histological stratification were excluded. Data from 49 studies encompassing 4,173 BC cases were extracted. Pooled HPV prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed by histology, geographic region, and HPV genotype (16/18). Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control designs.

Results: The pooled prevalence of HPV in BC tissues was 23% (95% CI: 18-28%), highest in invasive ductal carcinoma (24%). HPV-positive individuals exhibited a 3.6-fold higher risk of developing BC (OR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.33-5.64), with the strongest association in invasive lobular carcinoma (OR = 4.41). HPV-18 showed a more consistent correlation with BC than HPV-16. Regional variation was observed, with Asian populations…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free