Evidence Hub

Global Prevalence of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with New Data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Alvarenga RMP, Namen ME, Alvarenga M, Delgado RB, Santana RA, de Miranda IRP, Alvarenga MP, Neri VC et al.

Neuroepidemiology, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune astrocytopathy with geographic and ancestral variability in prevalence. Despite growing international epidemiological evidence, population-based prevalence studies of NMOSD remain scarce in Brazil.

Objective: The aim of the study was to integrate global evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis with new regional prevalence data from southeastern Brazil using complementary epidemiological and statistical methods.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting crude NMOSD prevalence between 2000 and 2025. In parallel, a multi-source prevalence study was performed in the Volta Redonda-Barra Mansa intermediate region of Rio de Janeiro State. Crude prevalence, classical two-source capture-recapture estimators, and Bayesian modeling were applied. A random-effects meta-analysis combined international estimates with Brazilian data and compared pooled results across continents.

Results: We identified 44 eligible studies from 28 countries, with substantial heterogeneity reflecting differences in diagnostic criteria, case-ascertainment strategies, and geographic coverage. Crude NMOSD prevalence ranged from 0.23 to 10.0 per 100,000 inhabitants. In the Brazilian regional study, 24 confirmed cases among 782,004 inhabitants yielded a crude prevalence of 3.07 per 100,000, with capture-recapture estimates ranging from 3.53 to 5.60 per 100,000 and Bayesian posterior mean…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free