Evidence Hub

Influence of HER2-low and HER2-zero status on pathologic complete response and survival in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Qin Y, Pu C, Fan Y, Zhu K

Frontiers in oncology, 2025

54,277 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To delve into the influence of different status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) on the long-term survival of patients suffering from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as well as the pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) via meta-analysis.

Methods: A computer search in the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was executed up to January 13, 2025, to collect studies related to HER2 status in TNBC patients. The articles were screened per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The required data were extracted. The study quality was appraised by means of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and statistical analysis was carried out utilizing Stata 15.0 software.

Results: 36 studies involving 54,277 patients with TNBC were included. According to the meta-analysis, the pCR rate after NAT was more notable in the HER2-zero group compared to the HER2-low group (RR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93, P 0.001). Regarding overall survival (OS), HER2-low patients exhibited a better prognosis (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.90-0.97, P < 0.001). For disease-free survival, breast cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival, HER2-low patients might experience an enhanced prognosis. However, the results did not exhibit statistically significant. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the meta-analysis results. No publication bias existed in studies on each outcome indicator.

Conclusion: HER2 status is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 54,277 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free