Evidence Hub

HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations in Children: A Systematic Review of Global Genotypic Evidence (2014-2026)

Jouf G, Alami AB, Maazaz N, Benchekroun S, Elharti E, Belbacha I, Ihazmad H, Jaoudi RE et al.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

HIV-1 infection in children remains a major public health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and routine virological monitoring is limited. The emergence of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations (DRMs) compromises treatment efficacy and threatens long-term therapeutic outcomes. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus to identify studies published from 2014 onward reporting HIV-1 genotypic resistance profiles in children receiving ART. Eligible studies included original research using Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Due to substantial methodological heterogeneity in study design, sequencing approaches, patient populations, and outcome reporting, a meta-analysis was not performed. The review therefore provides a narrative synthesis of resistance patterns and subtype distribution. Included studies involved children aged 2.1-16 years and sample sizes ranging from 3 to 1080 participants. Resistance mutations were most frequently observed in the NNRTI and NRTI classes, particularly K103N and M184V, whereas protease inhibitor and integrase inhibitor resistance remained less common. HIV-1 subtype distribution showed marked geographic variation, with CRF01_AE predominating in Asia, subtype C in Southern Africa, CRF02_AG and CRF06_cpx in West Africa, and subtype B in Europe and the Americas. These findings highlight the substantial burden of pediatric HIV-1 drug resistance and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free