Evidence Hub

Embracing the power of genomics to inform evolutionary significant units

Bergman JC, Taylor RS, Manseau M

The Journal of heredity, 2026

Abstract

Appropriate identification of evolutionary significant units (ESUs) is essential for effective conservation planning. Genomic data has emerged as a key tool to inform ESU decisions, yet it remains unclear how genomic data are being used in practice to identify the number of ESUs. To address this, we conducted a systematic literature review and found that genomic data are increasingly being used to suggest numbers of ESUs globally across plant and animal taxa. However, our review revealed inconsistencies in how ESUs are defined, with many studies not providing a definition. We also found inconsistencies in the methods used to analyze genomic data, highlighting the need for greater standardization to ensure studies adequately address both the discreteness and evolutionary significant components of ESUs. For example, separation on a principal component analysis or a high Fst cannot ensure evolutionary significance as they may be due to recent processes such as habitat fragmentation. Adaptive loci, a key advantage of genomic data, need to be interpreted with caution and simply identifying these loci may lead to inflated ESU estimates. Overall, we found that 68% of studies suggested an increase in the number of ESUs, and that the amount of gene flow detected did not appear to influence this conclusion. We provide clear definitions of the two key components of ESUs and specify which analyses can be used to assess each, as well as provide recommendations for future studies aiming…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free