Evidence Hub

Serum M2BPGi as a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic hepatitis B and C: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Park Y, Jo Y, Kim HS, Lee S, Jung HS, Lee HK, Choi SJN

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

830,000 participants

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) kills about 830,000 people each year, and most cases arise in chronic viral hepatitis. Better risk markers would let clinicians focus surveillance where it matters. Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a serum glycobiomarker of liver fibrosis. Several cohort studies tie elevated M2BPGi to HCC. No quantitative synthesis has pooled this evidence across viral etiologies.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through April 2026 for longitudinal studies that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for HCC linked to elevated M2BPGi in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or C (HCV). We registered the protocol with PROSPERO. The primary pool restricted to longitudinal studies with categorical cutoffs that reported HRs. We used random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood and the Hartung-Knapp adjustment.

Results: Twenty-three publications (24 study entries) met inclusion criteria. The primary pool of 15 longitudinal categorical HR-reporting studies covered 12,161 participants and at least 1,189 HCC events. The pooled HR was 4.61 (95% CI 3.24-6.54; p 2 = 25.6%). The 95% prediction interval ran from 2.08 to 10.18. The effect held across etiology (CHB k = 5 HR 4.12; HCV k = 10 HR 5.07; p_subgroup = 0.62) and across measurement timing (baseline HR 3.21; on/post-treatment HR 5.62; post-SVR HR 5.45; p_subgroup = 0.23). Two sensitivity pools re-introducing OR-based studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 830,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free