Evidence Hub

Mapping the global distribution of spotted fever group rickettsiae: a systematic review with modelling analysis

Yuan Zhang, Yanqun Sun, Jin-Jin Chen, Ai-Ying Teng, Tao Wang, Hao Li, Simon Iain Hay, Li-Qun Fang et al.

The Lancet Digital Health, 2022

95 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Emerging and re-emerging spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsioses are increasingly recognised worldwide as threats to public health, yet their global distribution and associated risk burden remain poorly understood. Methods In this systematic review and modelling analysis, we mapped global distributions of all confirmed species of SFG rickettsiae (SFGR) detected in animals, vectors, and human beings, using data collected from the literature. We assessed ecological drivers for the distributions of 17 major SFGR species using machine learning algorithms, and mapped model-predicted risks. Findings Between Jan 1, 1906, and March 31, 2021, we found reports of 48 confirmed SFGR species, with 66 133 human infections worldwide, with a large spatial variation across the continents. 198 vector species were detected to carry 47 of these Rickettsia spp. (146 ticks, 24 fleas, 15 mosquitoes, six mites, four lice, two keds, and one bug). Based on model-predicted global distributions of the 17 major SFGR species, we found five spatial clusters aggregated by ecological similarity in terms of environmental and ecoclimatic features. Rickettsia felis is the leading SFGR species to which 4.4 billion (95% CI 3.8–5.3 billion) people are at risk, followed by Rickettsia conorii (3.7 billion) and Rickettsia africae (3.6 billion). Interpretation The wide spectrum of vectors is contributing substantially to the increasing incidence of SFGR infections among humans. Awareness,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free