Evidence Hub

Functional evaluation of a spiral neobladder with an angled chimney; A prospective randomized comparative study

Moeen AM, Behnsawy HM, Faragallah MA, Gadelkareem RA, Osman MM, Moeen SM, Hameed DA, Zarzour MA

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2023

10 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to assess the functional outcome of performing ureteric re-implantation to an angled short chimney in a modified spiral orthotopic ileal neobladder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2020, 90 male patients with bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy and spiral ileal neobladder reconstruction with a chimney. Patients were randomly divided in two groups according to the position of the chimney [straight and angled] to which the ureters will be implanted. Postoperative evaluation included clinical, laboratory, radiographic and urodynamic studies.

RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths. The mean operative time for the procedure was 4.7 ± 1.2 h in group I and 4.9 ± 1.3 h in group II (p 0.456). No intraoperative complications occurred. Early postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients. In group I, according to the modified Clavien system, GII complication occurred in 2 (5%) patients in the form of DVT in 1 (2.5%) and surgical site infection in 1 (2.5%). GIIIa occurred in 3 (7.5%) patients in the form of wound dehiscence. In group II, GII occurred in 2 (4.8%) patients in the form of prolonged urinary leakage and myocardial infarction, each occurred in one patient. GIIIb occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient in the form of intestinal leak. Poucho-ureteral reflux occurred in 10 patients [3 (7.5%) in group I and 7 (16.8%) in group II (p 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of the right sided angled chimney during neobladder reconstruction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free