Evidence Hub

Long-term urinary continence and influencing factors after salvage radiotherapy: results of the SAKK 09/10 dose escalation trial

Schröder C, Zwahlen DR, Schär S, Hölscher T, Arnold W, Polat B, Hildebrandt G, Müller AC et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2025

344 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate late urinary incontinence (UI) after salvage radiotherapy (sRT) and the effect of dose escalation on late UI, incontinence recovery, and quality of life (QoL) as part of the SAKK 09/10 phase III trial.

METHODS: The SAKK 09/10 trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial for prostate cancer patients receiving sRT. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either conventional (64 Gy) or dose-escalated (70 Gy) sRT. Baseline and follow-up data were collected on urinary incontinence related QoL, and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS: 344 evaluable patients were analyzed. Baseline incontinence (≥Grade (G)1) was reported in 32.2 % of patients, with 8.7 % having ≥ G2. During follow-up (median 6.2 years), 47.2 % of the initially continent (<G1) patients showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) decline in continence with no significant difference between the treatment groups (p = 0.17). Of the initially incontinent patients, 54.1 % showed an improvement whilst 16.2 % showed further decline. 29.7 % had stable UI. There was no significant difference between the treatment arms (p = 0.36). In multivariable logistic regression, nerve sparing technique was associated with less UI at 24 months (p = 0.029) and at 60 months age (p = 0.031) and resection status (p = 0.046) were significant. There was a steady worsening of urinary symptoms reported over 60 months post RT, with an increase in the symptom scales from a mean of 15.9 at baseline…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 344 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free