Evidence Hub

Metabolic and vascular outcomes after transition to the MiniMed 780G system in adults ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, single-centre study

Matejko B, Cyranka K, Suduł P, Susuł K, Krężel J, Chernovol J, Maga P, Malecki MT et al.

Diabetologia, 2026

34 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems are increasingly regarded as the preferred therapy for type 1 diabetes, although evidence in older adults remains limited. The aim of this randomised study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the MiniMed 780G system in individuals with type 1 diabetes aged ≥65 years, with HbA1c<86 mmol/mol (10%), who were naive to this technology, with the primary endpoint based on glycaemic management (time in range). Vascular status and other glycaemic metrics were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Methods: This single-centre, open labelled (outcome assessors were not masked), randomised, controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled 34 participants who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomisation schedule to either advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) therapy or control therapy (multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion) and followed for 12 months.

Results: Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Baseline characteristics, including glycaemic metrics, were comparable across groups (p>0.05). The AHCL group demonstrated a rapid and sustained improvement in glycaemic management, with time in range increasing from 57.4% at baseline to 79.7% at 12 months (p1c (-5 mmol/mol; [95% CI -9.7, -0.4 mmol/mol] [-0.46%; -0.89%, -0.04%]). No serious adverse events or episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia occurred. Post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 34 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free