Evidence Hub

Edoxaban for atrial fibrillation in patients with atherosclerotic disease in daily clinical practice

de Vries TAC, de Groot JR, Pisters R, Hemels MEW, Komen JJ, Smolnik R, Fronk EM, Steffel J et al.

Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026

13,164 participants

Abstract

To estimate major clinical event rates for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerotic disease treated with edoxaban in routine practice, and to evaluate how well such patients were represented in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, the seminal randomized trial comparing edoxaban against warfarin for AF. ETNA-AF-Europe is a prospective cohort of AF patients receiving edoxaban in routine care. We compared patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (CAD/PAD) to: (1) those without CAD/PAD in ETNA-AF-Europe, and (2) CAD/PAD patients in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Of 13,164 patients in ETNA-AF-Europe, 23.3% had CAD/PAD. Compared with those without, patients with CAD/PAD had higher rates of stroke/systemic embolism (0.87%/year vs. 0.59%/year; HR 1.5, 95%-CI 1.14-1.88), acute coronary syndrome (1.24%/year vs. 0.37%/year; HR 3.3, 95%-CI 2.60-4.27), major bleeding (1.06%/year vs. 0.81%/year; HR 1.3, 95%-CI 1.04-1.63), cardiovascular death (1.59%/year vs. 0.85%/year; HR 1.9, 95%-CI 1.54-2.26), and all-cause death (6.02%/year vs. 3.53%/year; HR 1.7, 95%-CI 1.55-1.89). Compared with CAD/PAD patients in ENGAGE-AF TIMI-48, those in ETNA-AF-Europe had fewer cardiovascular comorbidities, less prevalent aspirin use (20.2% vs. 50.3%), and lower rates of stroke/systemic embolism (0.87%/year vs. 1.5%/year), major bleeding (1.04%/year vs. 3.0%/year), and cardiovascular death (1.59%/year vs. 3.7%), but higher non-cardiovascular mortality (4.43%/year vs. 1.6%/year). In routine practice, deaths and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 13,164 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free