Evidence Hub

Implementation of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire to understand participant experience in a phase 3 oncology clinical trial

Nowojewski A, Wheal A, Dott W, Ruscica D, Ghiorghiu S, Valastro B

BMJ open, 2025

371 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: To understand participant experience in the INTERLINK-1 clinical trial using the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ), explore factors associated with participant experience and evaluate the implementation of the SPFQ.

Design: Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.

Setting: 79 sites in 21 countries from October 2020 to October 2022.

Participants: 371 adults with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (39% aged >66 years, 69% White and 81% male).

Primary outcome measures: SPFQ administered at enrolment (SPFQ-A), during the trial (SPFQ-B) and at trial completion (SPFQ-C).

Results: A total of 223, 64 and 93 participants completed the SPFQ-A, SPFQ-B and SPFQ-C, respectively. Early termination of the INTERLINK-1 study limited the number of SPFQ-B and SPFQ-C responses. For all but one question, over 80% of participants selected positive responses, indicating positive experience with regards to enrolment (SPFQ-A), site (SPFQ-B) and overall trial (SPFQ-C). Individually, quality of life, continent and race were significantly associated with participant experience. Small numbers of negative and neutral responses enabled the construction of multiple ordinal regression models and were used to identify unbiased coefficients associated with patient experience. The models showed that males and participants in Asia reported worse experiences in questions regarding trial enrolment (p<0.05). Recent adverse events…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 371 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free