Evidence Hub

Assessing signs and impacts of achondroplasia: psychometric evaluation of the Achondroplasia Child Experience Measures

Brod M, McLeod L, Smith A

Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026

200 participants

Abstract

Background: Achondroplasia, although rare, is the most common genetic form of skeletal dysplasia and is associated with a wide range of clinical manifestations and complications throughout the body. This study evaluated the psychometric measurement properties of the Achondroplasia Child Experience Measures (ACEMs), which were previously conceptually developed as condition-specific, observer-reported outcome measures to assess the signs (ACEM-OSM) and impacts (ACEM-Impact) of achondroplasia in children aged 2 to < 12 years.

Methodology: Data for the psychometric evaluation were from a non-interventional, observational study (N = 200 (impacts) and N = 148 (signs)) and a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose escalation interventional trial (N = 57) of navepegritide (TransCon CNP) administered once weekly. The larger observational study sample size allowed for evaluation of distributional properties, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. Trial data was analyzed to confirm reliability and validity findings and evaluate responsiveness.

Results: Factor analysis and qualitative results identified six domains for the ACEM-Impact and one domain for the ACEM-OSM. The psychometric properties of both measures were found to be acceptable for reliability and validity for the intended use. An 8-item ACEM-OSM and a 25-item ACEM-Impact were finalized.

Conclusions: The ACEMs are reliable and valid measures of the signs and impacts of achondroplasia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free