Evidence Hub

Efficacy of the combination of levofloxacin plus ceftazidime in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit

M. Bassetti, E. Righi, R. Rosso, S. Mannelli, A. di Biagio, R. Fasce, F. Pallavicini, F. Marchetti et al.

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2006

21 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with a combination of levofloxacin and ceftazidime in Gram-negative hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), we performed a prospective, open-label, non-comparative, 1-year study in an Italian ICU. Patients received levofloxacin 500 mg twice a day intravenously plus ceftazidime 2 g three times a day intravenously for 7-14 days. Primary efficacy variables were clinical and microbiological responses at test-of-cure visit. Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequently identified pathogens. Clinical success was achieved in 17/21 clinically evaluable patients (81%) and in 12/15 microbiologically evaluable patients (80%). Regarding only the group with ventilator-associated pneumonia, cure was achieved in 10/14 clinically evaluable patients (71%) and in 11/14 microbiologically evaluable patients (79%). Therapy was well tolerated. We conclude that this combination regimen is safe and clinically and microbiologically efficacious in the treatment of Gram-negative HAP.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free