Evidence Hub

Assessing the uptake of the core outcome set in randomized controlled trials for coronary artery disease: a trial registry analysis

Skylarr Beerman, Harris Dean, Samuel Snider, Trevor Magee, Kyle Fitzgerald, Shaelyn Ward, Jay Modi, Kimberly Magana et al.

Trials, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a global health crisis, responsible for nearly 20 million deaths annually worldwide and 12.6% of all deaths in the United States. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are critical for developing evidence-based clinical guidelines, but inconsistent outcome reporting across RCTs hinders evidence synthesis and comparability. In 2015, McNamara et al. introduced a CAD core outcome set (COS) to promote standardization in CAD trial outcomes. This study evaluates the uptake of the CAD COS in RCTs registered at ClinicalTrials.gov since its publication. This trial registry analysis evaluated the uptake of the CAD COS in phase III/IV RCTs registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from May 2010 to June 2023. Trials were included if they assessed CAD interventions and excluded if the trials were non-randomized, focused on diagnostic tests, or were categorized as “not applicable” (e.g., behavioral interventions). COS adherence was measured as the proportion of reported outcomes among the 23 defined in the CAD COS. We analyzed changes in adherence over time, including pre- and post-COS publication periods, with secondary analyses examining continent, sponsor type, recruitment status, and enrollment number. Among 433 trials, procedural interventions (45.0%) and all-cause mortality (40.9%) were the most reported outcomes, while acute renal failure (2.1%) and dyspnea (2.8%) were the least. Pre-2015, trials reported an average of 11.5% of the COS-defined outcomes.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free