Evidence Hub

Continence Outcome of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Training after Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Thanathorn Thampravit, Romrawin Amonvuttikai, Thippawan Aysurin, Peeraya Ruthiraphong, P. Sangkum, C. Ketsuwan, W. Ratanapornsompong, Kun Sirisopana et al.

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2026

30 participants

Abstract

Background: Incontinence is the second most bothersome outcome after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Most patients will regain continence at one year, but pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) may represent a valid treatment to improve postoperative urinary continence.

Objective: To determine the relationship between preoperative PFMT functional outcomes in patients undergoing RARP.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate between December 2020 and June 2022 were randomized into two groups: Group A included 30 patients in standard RARP and a pre-operative PFMT program, and Group B included 30 patients in which only standard RARP was performed. The primary outcome was continent status at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery using the score from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). The higher score means poorer incontinence status. The secondary outcomes were continence status at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, assessed using the pad test score.

Results: The continent status at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively was evaluated by ICIQ-UI SF. The total mean score in Group A was better than that in Group B, but it was not statistically significant. The divided ICIQ-SF score by severity level showed a significant improvement in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence at one month…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free