Evidence Hub

A phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of selective index lymph node resection versus therapeutic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIB-D melanoma (MSLT-3/S2601/EORTC2519)

Maria Gonzalez, Georgina V. Long, A. Spillane, R. Saw, A. M. Menzies, M. Faries, Sapna P. Patel, Mario Mandalá et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2026

610 participants

Abstract

TPS9609

Background:

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy for resectable stage III melanoma, with randomized trials demonstrating superior outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy alone. The phase 2 SWOG-1801 trial showed 72% EFS at 2 yrs for NAT & 49% for adjuvant PEMBRO (P=0.004), while the phase 3 NADINA trial confirmed superiority of NAT IPI/NIVO over adjuvant NIVO (2-year RFS 83.7% vs 57.2%, HR 0.32). Pathological response, particularly major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor), strongly correlates with improved outcomes, with the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) pooled analysis (N=610 ICI patients) demonstrating 3-yr RFS of 93% for MPR patients (pts) vs 41% for those with no pathological response. The PRADO trial demonstrated that selective index lymph node (ILN) resection (RES) can safely de-escalate surgery in MPR pts, with only 4/60 (6.7%) MPR pts recurring after median follow-up of 28.1 months, all locoregionally. ILN RES significantly reduced surgical morbidity & improved quality of life compared to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). However, PRADO was a single-arm proof-of-concept study. An international survey of 117 melanoma experts showed 71% believe a phase 3 randomized controlled trial is needed to change practice. The MSLT-3 trial will definitively establish whether ILN RES is non-inferior to standard TLND for MPR pts.

Methods:

This phase 3, international,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 610 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free