Evidence Hub

Effects of different regimens for pelvic floor muscle training in young continent women: Randomized controlled clinical trial

V. S. Pereira-Baldon, M. A. Ávila, Carolina Bertholdo Dalarmi, A. D. de Oliveira, P. Driusso

Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, 2019

14 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy is recommended as first-line treatment to urinary incontinence (UI), and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) training is one of the most used resources for this purpose, no ideal PFM training protocol has been established.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to verify whether more daily sessions of PFM training lead to better PFM function.

METHODS

Twenty-five young continent women volunteered and were randomly assigned to 2 different groups; group 1, in which they performed one PFM training session daily, and group 2, in which they performed 3 daily PFM training sessions. All volunteers were evaluated regarding PFM function, based on the Modified Oxford Scale, maximum voluntary contraction, with a manometer, and PFM activation, with electromyography. Both groups trained during 8 consecutive weeks and were evaluated before and after treatment. All evaluations had the reproducibility tested by intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistical analyzes included data normality (Shapiro-Wilks), intragroup (Wilcoxon) and intergroup (Mann-Whitney U) comparisons. Effect sizes were calculated to all variables analyzed. Significance level was set al p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Even though an increase in PFM strength, pressure and muscle activation was achieved by both groups (p 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of daily training sessions does not interfere in the improvement of PFM function in young women without PFM dysfunction.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free