Evidence Hub

Can gastric pouch as orthotopic bladder replacement be used in adults?

Hauri D

The Journal of urology, 1996

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied orthotopic bladder replacement with stomach in adults with bladder carcinoma, with emphasis on possible subsequent complications, such as incontinence, the dysuria or hematuria syndrome, ulceration or perforation. We attempted to prove a correlation between stabilized urine pH and hypergastrinemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since June 1992, 19 men between 53 and 73 years old underwent surgery for nonmetastatic grade 3 bladder carcinoma according to our new technique.

RESULTS: Patient outcome was good. Possible complications are discussed, such as incontinence, hypergastrinemia and ulcerations.

CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient pouch capacity is achieved with our proposed operative technique. Urine pH must be monitored to prevent possible ulcerations and perforations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free