Evidence Hub

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy in children

Badawy H, Eid A, Dawood W, Hanno A

Journal of pediatric urology, 2013

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy is needed for securing a conduit for clean intermittent catheterization in children with myelomeningocele, posterior urethral valves and non-neuropathic neuropathic bladder. An open technique is widely used; herein we report our initial experience with minimally invasive laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2007-2011 we operated on 4 male children with a mean age of 6 years (3-9) suffering from posterior urethral valves (1), myelomeningocele (2), and non-neuropathic neuropathic bladder (1). A posterior Mitrofanoff trough was used in one child while in the remaining children we used the anterior Mitrofanoff trough.

RESULTS: The mean operative time was 3.5 h (3-5). The mean hospital stay was 3.7 days (2-5). The mean follow up was 12.5 months (5-30). All are continent; one child was converted to open because of failure to pass the catheter at the end of the procedure. Cosmetic aspect is perfect. No difficulty in catheterization was encountered.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff is a feasible, safe and effective technique associated with low morbidity.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free