Evidence Hub

Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy

Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI

Diseases of the colon and rectum, 1994

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of lateral internal anal sphincterotomy when treating anal fissure is to divide the distal one-third to one-half of the internal anal sphincter. This study aimed to evaluate prospectively the extent of disruption to the internal anal sphincter following lateral anal internal sphincterotomy and also to establish the prevalence of symptoms of anal incontinence in these patients.

METHODS: Fifteen patients with anal fissure (ten females and five males) had bowel symptoms assessed and anal endosonography performed preoperatively and two months after lateral internal anal sphincterotomy.

RESULTS: Anal endosonography was normal preoperatively in all but two females who had anterior external sphincter defects (presumedly from previous obstetric trauma). Postoperatively, apart from one male in whom no defect could be identified, all had an internal anal sphincter defect corresponding to the site of lateral internal anal sphincterotomy. In nine of the ten females, the defect involved the full length of the internal anal sphincter, but in the other four males, the defect involved the distal internal anal sphincter only. All were continent preoperatively, but after lateral internal anal sphincterotomy, three females became incontinent to flatus (two of whom had a preoperative external sphincter defect).

CONCLUSION: In contrast to lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in males, division of the internal anal sphincter in most females tends to be more extensive than…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free