Early results with restorative proctocolectomy
Abstract
The first 25 restorative proctocolectomies (RP) performed by one surgeon since 1986 are reviewed. Ulcerative colitis (23) and idiopathic megarectum (2) were the indications for surgery. The initial seven patients had a submucosal proctectomy and transanal hand sewn pouch-anal anastomosis. Eighteen patients had a totally stapled RP. One patient with malignancy died from factors unrelated to surgery. Complications developed in eight patients after pouch-anal anastomosis and in four patients after ileostomy closure. There was one pouch failure due to pelvic sepsis. No pelvic sepsis has occurred following a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with defunctioning ileostomy. After a mean follow up period of 20.5 months all patients are continent (mean stool frequency = 4/day and 0.5/night). Soiling occurred in three patients who had a transanal hand sewn pouch-anal anastomosis. All patients in the stapled group have satisfactory control. Restorative proctocolectomy produces satisfactory operative and functional results which have improved as our experience has increased.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Understanding the factors influencing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith) damage in African smallholder maize fields and quantifying its impact on yield. A case study in Eastern Zimbabwe
- Alarming situation of emerging H5 and H7 avian influenza and effective control strategies
- Livestock and food security: vulnerability to population growth and climate change
- Atmosphere–ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations
- Characterization of the global distribution and diversified plasmid reservoirs of the colistin resistance gene mcr-9
- The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pigs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.