Evidence Hub

Concomitant modified bladder neck closure and Mitrofanoff urinary diversion

Khoury AE, Agarwal SK, Bägli D, Merguerian P, McLorie GA

The Journal of urology, 1999

11 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe a modification of bladder neck closure for managing urinary incontinence in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 11 patients with intractable urinary incontinence that persisted after multiple failed surgical procedures we performed modified bladder neck closure with construction of a catheterizable continent conduit.

RESULTS: Mean followup is 3 years. All patients were continent after the procedure and none had a fistula or urinary leakage. One patient required stomal and conduit revision, and bladder stones in 3 necessitated endoscopic removal.

CONCLUSIONS: We recommend this modified technique of bladder neck closure as an option for managing urinary incontinence in a complex group of children because it allows the achievement of continence with minimal morbidity.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free