Evidence Hub

Cross-sectional study of gender differences in the perception of body image during cancer-induced weight loss: study protocol for the GRACE study (Global Research on Appearance in Cancer)

Goodrose-Flores C, Bonn S, Trolle Lagerros Y, Arends J, Blum D, Figueroa Donoso C, Frazier H, Lin SA et al.

BMJ open, 2026

600 participants

Abstract

Background: Unintentional weight loss is prevalent in advanced cancer and maintaining weight is critical to improve clinical outcomes. Body image plays a significant role in how weight loss is perceived. A previous Swedish study showed that men with advanced cancer had a negative perception of cancer-induced weight loss whereas women perceived the weight loss more positively.

Objectives: The aim of the GRACE study (Global Research on Appearance in Cancer) is to study gender differences in the perception of body image during cancer-induced weight loss. Second, we aim to explore cross-country differences in perceptions of body image.

Methods and analysis: This is a study protocol for a multi-centre, cross-sectional study across six countries (Sweden, Chile, New Zealand, Switzerland, the United States and Vietnam) spanning five continents. We aim to recruit 50 women and 50 men with advanced cancer from each country, targeting 600 people in total. Data will be collected through a structured digital questionnaire covering perceived body image measured with the Body Image Scale (BIS), demographics, anthropometrics, weight history, disease-related symptoms and dietary intake. Data collection started in 2025. Patients are enrolled at each site following ethical approval. The primary endpoint is difference in BIS-score between men and women. A difference of 3 BIS points between groups will be considered clinically significant. For statistical analysis, multivariable linear regression…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free