Evidence Hub

Multicentre, controlled, randomised and single-blind, adaptive phase IV protocol to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy to optimise tacrolimus dosage in a pretransplant chronic kidney disease population cohort: iPHARMGx TRANSPGx nested clinical trial

Seco-Meseguer E, Stewart S, Diago-Sempere E, Jiménez C, Macías Carmona N, Fernández Solís J, Vila Santandreu A, Valero San Cecilio R et al.

BMJ open, 2026

114 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic variations impact drug response, driving the need for personalised medicine through pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing. However, the adoption of pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing for commonly prescribed drugs, such as tacrolimus, outside of tertiary hospitals is limited due to a lack of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support widespread implementation by healthcare policymakers. The iPHARMGx Consortium addresses this by developing the TRANSPGx clinical trial to assess the hypothesis that widespread adoption of a pre-emptive genotyping scheme in populations susceptible to receiving tacrolimus as immunosuppressive therapy following a kidney transplant is effective, cost-effective and feasible within the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) when compared to the standard of care tacrolimus dosing.

Methods and analysis: The TRANSPGx trial is a multicentre, adaptive, randomised, controlled, pragmatic phase IV clinical trial nested within the iPHARMGx master protocol, with two parallel arms, aiming for superiority. Randomisation will be conducted on an individual basis with a centralised approach, with stratification by centre. After inclusion in the trial and completion of genotyping, subjects will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group (pharmacogenetic genotype-guided tacrolimus prescription) or the standard of care tacrolimus prescription (as deemed by the attending physician). The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 114 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free