Evidence Hub

Phase 2C clinical trial of novel short-course regimens for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: TBTC study 38/CRUSH-TB design

Kurbatova EV, Dooley KE, Carr W, Stout JE, Nuermberger EL, Phillips PPJ, Scott NA, Upton CM et al.

Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

288 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Preclinical and clinical study data show that combining bedaquiline (B or BDQ), moxifloxacin (M), and pyrazinamide (Z), known as BMZ, has potent antimicrobial activity that might shorten treatment duration for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.

Methods/design: We describe the design of Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (TBTC) Study 38/CRUSH-TB (NCT05766267), an open-label multicenter international randomized controlled phase 2C trial that compares two four-month regimens, BMZ plus rifabutin (Rb) (2BMZRb/2BMRb) or BMZ plus delamanid (D or DLM) (2BMZD/2BMD), with standard 6-months isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE). All drugs are administered seven days per week, under direct observation, at least five days per week. A total of 288 participants, aged ≥12 years, newly diagnosed with sputum smear-positive or Xpert MTB/RIF (Ultra)-positive drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis, will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive BMZRb, BMZD, or HRZE. Participants are followed until 78 weeks post-randomization, or until the last enrolled participant completes 52 weeks post-randomization, whichever comes first. The primary endpoint is time to sputum culture negative in liquid media. Secondary endpoints include sustained cure, safety, and additional mycobacteriology and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes. This trial has an adaptive design, wherein new arms can be added.

Discussion: This trial tests the hypothesis whether four-month BMZ-based…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 288 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free