Evidence Hub

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Mavacamten in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Interim Results of the PIONEER-OLE Study

Masri A, Lester SJ, Stendahl JC, Hegde SM, Sehnert AJ, Balaratnam G, Shah A, Fox S et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024

20 participants · 37 citations

Abstract

Background: The phase 2 PIONEER-HCM (Phase 2 Open-label Pilot Study Evaluating Mavacamten in Subjects With Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction) study showed that mavacamten improved left ventricular outflow tract gradients, exercise capacity, and symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but the results of longer-term treatment are less well described. We report interim results from the PIONEER-OLE (PIONEER Open-Label Extension) study, the longest-term study of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM.

Methods and results: Patients who previously completed PIONEER-HCM (n=20) were eligible to enroll in PIONEER-OLE. Patients received oral mavacamten, 5 mg once daily (starting dose), with individualized dose titration at week 6. Evaluations included serial monitoring of safety, echocardiography, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score, and serum NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels. Thirteen patients enrolled and received mavacamten (median study duration at data cutoff, 201 weeks). Most patients (92.3%) received β-blockers concomitantly. Treatment-emergent adverse events were predominantly mild/moderate. One patient had an isolated reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction to 47%, which recovered and remained normal with continued treatment at a reduced dose. At week 180, mavacamten was associated with New York Heart Association…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free