Evidence Hub

Incidence and risk factors for fecal incontinence in black and white older adults: a population-based study

Markland AD, Goode PS, Burgio KL, Redden DT, Richter HE, Sawyer P, Allman RM

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010

557 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of fecal incontinence (FI) in community-dwelling older adults and identify risk factors associated with incident FI.

DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.

SETTING: Three rural and two urban Alabama counties (in-home assessments 2000-2005).

PARTICIPANTS: Stratified random sample of 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries: 25% African-American men, 25% white men, 25% African-American women, 25% white women, aged 65 and older. Eligible participants for this analysis were continent at baseline and community-dwelling 4 years later (n=557).

MEASUREMENTS: FI was defined as any loss of control of bowels occurring during the previous year. Independent variables were sociodemographics, Charlson comorbidity counts, self-reported bowel symptoms (chronic diarrhea and constipation), depression, and body mass index (BMI). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed using incident FI as the dependent variable.

RESULTS: The incidence rate of FI at 4 years was 17% (95% confidence interval (CI)=13.7-20.1), with 6% developing FI at least monthly (95% CI=4.0-8.3). White women were more likely to have incident FI (22%) than African-American women (13%, P=.04); no racial differences were observed in men. Controlling for age, comorbidity count, and BMI, significant independent risk factors for incident FI in women were white race, depression, chronic diarrhea, and urinary incontinence (UI). UI was the only…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 557 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free