Evidence Hub

Impact of Early Acute Kidney Injury on Management and Outcome in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Study

McNicholas BA, Rezoagli E, Pham T, Madotto F, Guiard E, Fanelli V, Bellani G, Griffin MD et al.

Critical care medicine, 2019

52 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand the impact of mild-moderate and severe acute kidney injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the "Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure", an international prospective cohort study of patients with severe respiratory failure.

SETTING

Four-hundred fifty-nine ICUs from 50 countries across five continents.

SUBJECTS

Patients with a glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m prior to admission who fulfilled criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome on day 1 and day 2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorized based on worst serum creatinine or urine output into: 1) no acute kidney injury (serum creatinine 354 µmol/L or renal replacement therapy or minimum urine output < 0.3 mL/kg/hr).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was hospital mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included prevalence of acute kidney injury and characterization of acute respiratory distress syndrome risk factors and illness severity patterns, in patients with acute kidney injury versus no acute kidney injury. One-thousand nine-hundred seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria: 1,209 (61%) with no acute kidney injury, 468 (24%) with mild-moderate acute kidney injury, and 297 (15%) with severe acute kidney injury. The impact of acute kidney injury on the ventilatory management of patients with acute respiratory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free