Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Exposure and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Gagnier JJ, O'Connor JP

International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026

Abstract

Glyphosate-based herbicides are widely used agricultural chemicals. Concerns regarding carcinogenicity, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), persist. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better evaluate glyphosate exposure and NHL risk. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for eligible cohort, case-control, and pooled studies. Risk of bias was assessed using recommended criteria. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed, with sensitivity analyses addressing overlapping cohorts, hazard ratio inclusion, exposure definitions, and model overfitting. Evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Ten primary datasets were analyzed. Ever-exposure was associated with an odds ratio of 1.11. Highest-exposure analyses demonstrated a significant association with NHL. Ever-exposure associations were modest, whereas a higher glyphosate exposure was consistently associated with an increased NHL risk. The findings were robust across sensitivity analyses.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free