Evidence Hub

Investigating the Impact of Host Genetics on the Risk of Disease Progression in Individuals With Influenza

Mørup SB, Milojevic M, Shahri SMT, Sherman BT, Chang W, Lynfield R, Helleberg M, Skeans M et al.

Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2026

3,469 participants

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of the human genetic contribution to the risk of complications from influenza is limited. This study assessed the association between human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and disease progression in individuals with influenza.

Methods: A targeted analysis of 10 SNPs with prior evidence in COVID-19 and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) were used to assess associations between SNPs and disease progression in two multinational cohorts with suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza: a hospitalized cohort (n = 1634) and a pooled cohort of hospitalized and outpatients (n = 3469). Disease progression was defined as prolonged hospitalization (> 28 days), progression to mechanical ventilation, admittance to intensive care unit, or death (for hospitalized individuals) or progression to hospitalization or death (for outpatients).

Results: Disease progression was observed in 9.1% of hospitalized patients and 2.2% of outpatients. Age was a significant risk factor for disease progression, with 20% increased odds of disease progression per 10-year increase in age (OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.08-1.33, p < 0.001). Disease progression rates also differed by continent (p < 0.0001). Targeted SNP analyses did not identify significant associations with disease progression; however, the strength of associations was most pronounced in sensitivity analyses for the pooled cohort in individuals < 65 years old. GWAS analyses did not identify significant common SNP…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,469 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free