Evidence Hub

Geographical differences in the stress and distress of climate change journalists: An observational study

Feinstein A, Mead J, Ortiz DA, Cochrane G, Dunn K, Mukherjee M

JRSM open, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate potential inter-continental mental health differences in journalists covering climate-related events.

Design: Descriptive, cross sectional.

Setting: Internet-based study.

Participants: Journalists recruited from the Oxford Climate Journalist Network: 268 of 561 (48.6%) journalists from 89 countries completed the study.

Main outcome measures: Questions related to physical threat and loss secondary to climate change. Symptoms of anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7-item scale [GAD-7]), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), posttraumatic stress disorder (PCL-5) and Moral Injury (Toronto Moral Injury Scale for Journalists [TMIS-J]).

Results: More African and Asian journalists felt physically threatened than journalists in Europe (p p = .002, respectively). More journalists in Africa had lost a family member to climate change than journalists in the Americas (p = .009), and Asia and Europe (p p p = .003, and p = .001, respectively). There were higher PTSD-intrusion scores in African and Asian than European journalists (p = .001 and p p = .014 and p = .001, respectively. African and Asian journalists were less likely to receive psychotherapy than European journalists (p < .001 for both).

Conclusions: Given the enduring challenges posed by climate change, addressing these inequalities in journalists' care should not be delayed any further.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free